The guided builder needs JavaScript for its security check. Send your scope and requested outcomes to sales@healthcarepentest.com, with your NDA/RFP if available.
01 / THE ENGAGEMENTProvider groups, outpatient clinics, laboratories and digital health platforms
Test the path. Understand the consequence.
Find where a digital interaction can cross into another patient’s records, an overprivileged service account or a poorly separated support network.
A healthcare estate extends beyond one hospital. We connect identity, referrals, remote care and third-party integrations into a scope that follows the patient-data journey.
A patient portal can be well defended at the login screen while a laboratory integration accepts a record identifier without checking the requesting organisation. The valuable test follows those hand-offs, including the support processes that sit outside the main application.
Define systems, identities, objectives, permissions and operating constraints.
02
Model the path
Connect relevant attack scenarios to the services and data you need to protect.
03
Test under control
Use synthetic patient identities and agreed data cohorts. Name a clinical escalation contact, set request limits and exclude treatment-affecting actions unless separately authorised. Stop immediately if testing encounters unexpected live clinical data or threatens a care workflow.
04
Document the result
Record actions, responses, effective controls and the limits of access gained.
05
Verify the repair
Prioritise findings, assign ownership and retest agreed acceptance criteria.
Healthcare security requirements depend on entity, location and processing. For EU organisations, assess NIS2 scope and national implementation alongside GDPR security obligations. For US covered entities and business associates, consider HIPAA separately. A pentest contributes technical evidence; it does not determine legal applicability or certify compliance.
INSIDE THE SAMPLE REPORT
Requests. Responses. Results you can inspect.
The fictional Healthcare AG case contains 68 pages, three connected scenarios, twelve findings and individual treatment plans.
Scoped scans, WAF responses, shell context and downstream API results.
02
A bounded conclusion
Separate unaided access, approved assistance, blocked routes and unperformed actions.
03
A useful next step
Owners, immediate safeguards, durable fixes and completed or pending retests.
Protect the patient-data boundaries your services rely on
Healthcare penetration testing should examine who can reach patient information and sensitive functions across portals, APIs and supporting systems. We agree the clinical and operational constraints before choosing techniques. Synthetic records, designated identities and explicit third-party permissions keep the engagement focused on useful evidence.
Patient-facing applications: account ownership, delegated access and sensitive exports.
APIs and integrations: identity, patient context and permitted operations.
Reporting: observed behaviour, evidence limits, repair priorities and verification criteria.
Build an encounter and delegated-access test matrix for healthcare portals and APIs, including expiry, referrals, exports and synthetic patient fixtures.
Evaluate agentic and manual healthcare testing through tool authority, patient-data handling, human review, stop controls, coverage and reproducible evidence.
Read the perspective ↗
A PRACTICAL STARTING POINT
Prepare for the scoping call.
Bring systems, permissions, operating constraints and evidence needs together.